[Coco] Does anyone want a CoCoWeb?

Allen Huffman alsplace at pobox.com
Wed Apr 25 18:42:12 EDT 2018

On Apr 22, 2018, at 9:45 AM, Dave Chesek <djchez at comcast.net> wrote:
> The possibility to do something useful on stock equipment, only adding some modern connectivity, should be welcomed as a natural extension of what would have been done had the technology existed at the time, as Steve points out. Is the CoCoSDC worthwhile? Or DriveWire? Or the ability to connect to VGA or HDMI? No one needs a CoCo, or any of these things. So what! We have them and get enjoyment out of using them, and the camaraderie this hobby engenders. That's reason enough.

The Magic here is, of course, that the hard part has already been done. Now we just need some software support, which could be done in BASIC.

When I get recovered from my "convention crud" cold, I have to update the CoCoWiFi firmware to the latest, and then finish up on SirSound. Once the hardware boards for each are available, I’ll start working on some internet utilities.

I am hoping that, by next year's CoCoFEST (if there is one), we can finally eliminate "Sneaker Net" as a CoCo supported protocol.

More information about the Coco mailing list