[Coco] DE-1 Clarification Please
tim franklinlabs.com
tim at franklinlabs.com
Sun Oct 29 08:48:32 EDT 2017
Same here. I've been working with the DE1, DE2 and several other
(Chinese) FPGA development boards and I've never had a problem with the
flash or RAM burning using the Quartus programmers.
And yeah, the comment about the burn cycles was deserved. I'm anal
about the details and wanted Mr. Boss to know that Flash does have
limits. LOL
On October 29, 2017 at 7:23 AM Mark McDougall wrote:
On 29/10/2017 9:30 AM, James Ross wrote:
It should not be the fact that one must program their device
multiple
times before it takes (not saying that you are implying that
either).
Just saying, that there has got to be a precise explanation of what
folks are doing wrong and why that does not work when they do that.
Given the manual, multi-step, nature of the programming process, and
the
variances across PC hardware and driver versions, odds are the
issues
can be traced back to a fault on the PC side of the cable, rather
than
the DE1 itself.
For the record, I've used the DE1 for years on a number of projects,
mostly non-Coco-related and haven't had a systemic issue that I can
recall with programming the flash via the Control Panel.
Not to say that I haven't been simply lucky and that the
TerASIC-supplied software isn't temperamental.
Regards,
--
Mark McDougall
--
Coco mailing list
[1]Coco at maltedmedia.com
[2]https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
References
1. mailto:Coco at maltedmedia.com
2. https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
More information about the Coco
mailing list