[Coco] NitrOS9 question
L. Curtis Boyle
curtisboyle at sasktel.net
Fri Oct 6 00:21:18 EDT 2017
Is that the BLOB (Boot List Order Bug) showing up again?
L. Curtis Boyle
curtisboyle at sasktel.net
> On Oct 5, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Dave Philipsen <dave at davebiz.com> wrote:
>
> Ok, I just found out something very interesting. I decided to assemble a dummy VTIO with entry points for Init, Read, Write, GetStat, SetStat, and Term. There is no code in the module except for a single rts that all six routines point to. When I include this version of VTIO in the bootfile it still fails in headless mode. The VTIO module is only about 140 bytes long. Now, when I simply add a few lines with:
>
> fcc /00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000/
>
> This makes the VTIO module a little bigger. It is now 497 bytes long. And, it works! Don't ask me why but I have a feeling it has nothing to do with what's in VTIO. But it could possibly have something to do with where other modules end up in memory. I'm wondering now if it's something strange going on with CCBKrn...
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> On 10/5/2017 10:58 PM, David Ladd wrote:
>> Dave,
>>
>> That is interesting. Since in the headless options in the repo I don't see
>> the VTIO listed in the modules. I know as I used the Toolshed's OS9
>> utility to ident one of the bootfile's and I didn't see VTIO in there
>> anywhere.
>>
>> Though there is a disk image for becker_headless.
>>
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>> | David Ladd a.k.a. PacoOtaktay a.k.a. Drencor |
>> | YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/user/PacoOtaktay |
>> | YouTube Gaming Live: https://gaming.youtube.com/user/PacoOtaktay/live |
>> | Websites: http://dwladd.com & http://www.theterrorzone.com |
>> | G+: https://plus.google.com/113262444659438038657 |
>> | G+: https://plus.google.com/+DavidLaddPacoOtaktay |
>> | |
>> | Do you have your CoCo 3 yet? |
>> +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:46 PM, Dave Philipsen <dave at davebiz.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, well here's something somewhat interesting. I don't have the VTIO
>>> source file setup yet where I can assemble it on my CoCo3FPGA. But, I made
>>> a copy of the VTIO module and I patched it by putting 'RTS' in place of the
>>> long branches to init, read, write, getstat, settat, and the first byte of
>>> the term routines. So, effectively, there is no access to the module.
>>> When I include it in the bootfile for the headless boot the shell still
>>> works!
>>>
>>> So could it be just the mere existence of the VTIO module makes the shell
>>> work for some oddball reason?
>>>
>>> The next thing I'm going to try is to assemble a 100% bogus VTIO module
>>> with only code in it to return (rts) from the six entry points and see what
>>> happens.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/5/2017 10:05 PM, Bill Pierce via Coco wrote:
>>>
>>>> There's 2 shells built in NitrOS9... try the other one. The one used in
>>>> L2 is ShellPlus. The L1 shell (will work in L2) is shell_21.
>>>> Shell plus monitors for keystrokes for the arrow keys for the cmd line so
>>>> that may be what you're running into. I don't think shell_21 does this (not
>>>> sure).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bill Pierce
>>>> "Charlie stole the handle, and the train it won't stop going, no way to
>>>> slow down!" - Ian Anderson - Jethro Tull
>>>>
>>>> My Music from the Tandy/Radio Shack Color Computer 2 & 3
>>>> https://sites.google.com/site/dabarnstudio/
>>>> Co-Contributor, Co-Editor for CocoPedia
>>>> http://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
>>>>
>>>> E-Mail: ooogalapasooo at aol.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Dave Philipsen <dave at davebiz.com>
>>>> To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts <coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>>> Sent: Thu, Oct 5, 2017 10:18 pm
>>>> Subject: Re: [Coco] NitrOS9 question
>>>>
>>>> Look in nitros9-v3.3.0/level2/defs/DefsfileSee if it's listed there. It
>>>> may be of no consequence though. Interesting thing is that I can tell sysgo
>>>> to run another program on startup instead of shell and it will run. The
>>>> only way I can get shell to run is if I include VTIO in the bootfile.DaveOn
>>>> 10/5/2017 9:00 PM, Bill Pierce via Coco wrote:> Dave, where did you get
>>>> your sources? I have searched the entire repository for "systype" and found
>>>> nothing. I remember systype from vanilla OS9, but I don't think it's used
>>>> anymore.> The current VTIO source does reference "cocovtio.d" though.>>
>>>> >> >> Bill Pierce> "Charlie stole the handle, and the train it won't
>>>> stop going, no way to slow down!" - Ian Anderson - Jethro Tull>> My Music
>>>> from the Tandy/Radio Shack Color Computer 2 & 3>
>>>> https://sites.google.com/site/dabarnstudio/> Co-Contributor, Co-Editor
>>>> for CocoPedia> http://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page>>
>>>> E-Mail: ooogalapasooo at aol.com>> >> >> -----Original Message----->
>>>> From: Dave Philipsen <dave at davebiz.com>> To: coco <coco at maltedmedia.com>>
>>>> Sent: Thu, Oct 5, 2017 6:00 pm> Subject: Re: [Coco] NitrOS9 question>> Ok,
>>>> so now I am delving in to vtio.asm and I've hit another brick wall. I
>>>> thought I had all of the files required to build NitrOS9 but I see a
>>>> reference to a file called "systype" in the defsfile. My defsfile only
>>>> references os9defs, rbfdefs, scfdefs, and cocodefs. Where do I find the
>>>> systype file? Perhaps it contains the refrerence for SHFTCLR and
>>>> ohers.DaveOn 10/5/2017 4:12 PM, David Ladd wrote:> Dave,>> I have not tried
>>>> NitrOS-9 L2 as a headless configuration yet. Looking at> the headless
>>>> section in the build process for the NitrOS-9 Project. I> don't see the
>>>> keyboard, joy, or snd driver in the headless area so that is> a good sign.
>>>> I do see a scdwv.dr and term_scdwv.dt which tells me that you> probably can
>>>> use the term_sc6551.dt and sc6551.dr.>> I myself can not verify this as my
>>>> CoCo3FPGA is not in working condition> right now. As soon as I get my
>>>> Analog board back I will certainly
>>>> try some> of this out.>> +-----------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------+> | David Ladd a.k.a.
>>>> PacoOtaktay a.k.a. Drencor |> | YouTube:
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/user/PacoOtaktay |> |
>>>> YouTube Gaming Live: https://gaming.youtube.com/user/PacoOtaktay/live |>
>>>> | Websites: http://dwladd.com & http://www.theterrorzone.com
>>>> |> | G+: https://plus.google.com/113262444659438038657
>>>> |> | G+: https://plus.google.com/+DavidLaddPacoOtaktay
>>>> |> | |> | Do you have your CoCo 3 yet?
>>>> |> +-----------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------+>>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at
>>>> 2:25 PM, Dave Philipsen <dave at davebiz.com> wrote:>>> Ummm....I shouldn't
>>>> need to. I've defined T2 as the default console in>> Init.>>>> In fact, as
>>>> I'm writing this I just tried adding Term back into the>> bootfile and I
>>>> still have the same problem. I get the Init and sysgo>> sign-on banners
>>>> but the shell is not chained.>>>>>> Dave>>>>>>>> On 10/5/2017 2:04 PM,
>>>> David Ladd wrote:>>>>> Dave,>>>>>>> I think you still need a TERM
>>>> descriptor? Though in this case you>>> probably>>> need a TERM descriptor
>>>> based on T2?>>>>>> +-----------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------+>>> | David Ladd a.k.a.
>>>> PacoOtaktay a.k.a. Drencor |>>> | YouTube:
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/user/PacoOtaktay |>>> |
>>>> YouTube Gaming Live: https://gaming.youtube.com/user/PacoOtaktay/live
>>>> |>>> | Websites: http://dwladd.com & http://www.theterrorzone.com
>>>> |>>> | G+: https://plus.google.com/113262444659438038657
>>>> |>>> | G+: https://plus.google.com/+DavidLaddPacoOtaktay
>>>> |>>> | |>>> | Do you have your CoCo 3 yet?
>>>> |>>> +-----------------------------
>>>> ------------------------------------------+>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017
>>>> at 1:16 PM, Dave Philipsen <dave at davebiz.com> wrote:>>
>>>>
>>>>> Ok, so I've successfully eliminated CoWin, KeyDrv, SndDrv, JoyDrv,
>>>>>>>> RBDW,>>>> DWIO, RAMD, R0, and Term from my bootfile and the CoCo3FPGA boots
>>>>>>>> up>>>> with a>>>> shell on T2. But, when I try to remove VTIO I get the
>>>>>>>> signon message>>>> from>>>> Init on T2 but I don't get a shell. To my
>>>>>>>> knowledge VTIO is simply a>>>> device driver module for the SCF window
>>>>>>>> devices. If I have no window>>>> device descriptors in the bootfile, then,
>>>>>>>> why is VTIO needed? See output>>>> from 'mdir' below:>>>>>>>>>>>> KrnP2
>>>>>>>> Init Clock Clock2 IOMan RBF>>>> SCF
>>>>>>>> PipeMan RBSuper LLCoCo3FPGA Piper SD1>>>> DD SC6551
>>>>>>>> VTIO T2 Pipe CCBKrn>>>> MDir Shell Date
>>>>>>>> DeIniz Echo Iniz>>>> Link Load Save Unlink>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dave>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/3/2017 11:12 PM, Dave Philipsen
>>>>>>>> wrote:>>>>>>>> Yep, it's an FPGA board so it's a synthesized 6809 running
>>>>>>>> at 25 MHz.>>>>> Dave>>>>>>>>>> On 10/3/2017 9:23 PM, Brett Gordon
>>>>>>>> wrote:>>>>>>>>>> I take it your platform is also 6809 based? Cool.. Sounds
>>>>>>>> like a neat>>>>>> idea. Loads of fun. kudos on the> bootloader mod -
>>>>>>>> submit patch!>>>>>>>>>>>> brett>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->>>> Coco mailing
>>>>>>>> list>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com>>>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mai
>>>>>>>> lman/listinfo/coco>>>>>>>>>> -->> Coco mailing list>>
>>>>>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mai
>>>>>>>> lman/listinfo/coco>>-- Coco mailing listCoco at maltedmedia.comhttps://
>>>>>>>> pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco>-- Coco mailing
>>>>>>>> listCoco at maltedmedia.comhttps://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/l
>>>>>>>> istinfo/coco
>>>>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>>
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list