[Coco] Basic09 6309 version
Bill Pierce
ooogalapasooo at aol.com
Thu May 25 05:17:36 EDT 2017
I did a search through the nitros9 sources and only found 6 references to "divq". 2 were in asm and disasm which were only references for the programs asm/disasm functionality and no actual running code, 2 were in 2 of Boisy's test routines in one of his folders (not used for anything), and the other 2 were in basic09 and runb. So they are the only 2 nitros9 modules that would rare their ugly heads on this.
I do remember some years ago when Joseph was developing VCC that there was some mention of something being missing in the 6309 core. I've searched but couldn't find where I saw it (it was loooong ago). I've even mentioned it in the issues on the VCC repo issues page. We may have found what it was.
Bill Pierce
"Charlie stole the handle, and the train it won't stop going, no way to slow down!" - Ian Anderson - Jethro Tull
My Music from the Tandy/Radio Shack Color Computer 2 & 3
https://sites.google.com/site/dabarnstudio/
Co-Contributor, Co-Editor for CocoPedia
http://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
E-Mail: ooogalapasooo at aol.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Walter Zambotti <zambotti at iinet.net.au>
To: 'CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts' <coco at maltedmedia.com>
Sent: Thu, May 25, 2017 3:31 am
Subject: Re: [Coco] Basic09 6309 version
>This could explain the Hitting DIVQ_X error that VCC keeps complaining about.This error could be isolated to either VCC or BASIC09_6309.We can eliminate which one is the problem by running the BASIC09_6309 version on a real 6309 coco and not in VCC. If the same problem persists then the problem in in BASIC09_6309. If it does not persist then the problem is in VCC.I don't have a 6309 in my CoCo so I can't volunteer to help.Any takers out there?Walter-----Original Message-----From: Coco [mailto:coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com] On Behalf Of Wayne CampbellSent: Thursday, 25 May 2017 12:11 PMTo: CoCoList <coco at maltedmedia.com>Subject: Re: [Coco] Basic09 6309 versionThis could explain the Hitting DIVQ_X error that VCC keeps complaining about.On May 24, 2017 8:52 PM, "William Astle" <lost at l-w.ca> wrote:My guess is the VCC isn't implementing DIVQ correctly, probably by not providing the remainder unless regular integer division is also failing.--Coco mailing listCoco at maltedmedia.comhttps://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco-- Coco mailing listCoco at maltedmedia.comhttps://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
More information about the Coco
mailing list