[Coco] CoCo Talk #7 "For Beginners" Saturday, May 6th @ 2:00 PM EST

[Michael Brant]

Curtis I really like the idea of dividing in to segments for one major
reason, Later the topics can be grouped more easily and put in playlists or
on to DVDs for future viewing.

On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 5:42 PM, L. Curtis Boyle <curtisboyle at sasktel.net>
wrote:

> I think the main purpose is just to have some variety, so that we have
> something of interest (and education) for all users, of all levels. I
> wouldn’t count #6 as non-technical; it was a Fest wrap up. We also are not
> scheduling specific talks for specific topics; this was just a week we
> wanted to help some of the newer people in the community get involved, and
> to learn what all new stuff is out. Some of those questions even involved
> hardware projects from yourself, Ed and Mark Marlette; it actually helps
> promote your projects to people who may have heard of them, but have no
> real idea what it does or what is capable of.
> Fear not; technical topics will still be featured. We just plan on mixing
> things up a bit. If there is enough demand, maybe we will split a talk into
> 2 (or more segments), so that we can cover multiple levels of users in the
> same show. And how much time is spent on (each) topic will depend on the
> crowd hanging around in Skype that particular day. :-)
>
>
> L. Curtis Boyle
> curtisboyle at sasktel.net
>
>
>
> > On May 5, 2017, at 10:00 PM, RETRO Innovations <go4retro at go4retro.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/5/2017 9:43 PM, Steve Strowbridge wrote:
> >> Jim there really isn't a goal, other than to talk about the CoCo, this
> was
> >> a suggestion by Curtis to try an episode that may be more user friendly
> to
> >> people who aren't as technical or are newer to the CoCo.
> > Understood, but from last week's blurb:
> >
> > "It was suggested on the Facebook group that we have a session set aside
> for beginners and not go into deep technical discussions, and I'm 100% OK
> with that as well."
> >
> > Did it not happen last week?  From the way it was inserted into the note
> for last week's discussion, I took away that last week's discussion was
> indeed supposed to be non technical in nature.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> > --
> > Coco mailing list
> > Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> >
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>