[Coco] Testing a 63C09

[Zippster]

Nice one.  :)

- Ed


> On Jun 8, 2017, at 10:59 PM, Arthur Flexser <flexser at fiu.edu> wrote:
> 
> Here's a very simple test:
> 
> 10 POKE&H3000,&H3E
> 20 EXEC &H3000
> 
> On a 6809, this should cause a warm reset (OK prompt).  $3E is an
> undocumented 6809 instruction that is equivalent to pressing the reset
> button.
> 
> On a 6309, the $3E instruction should be seen as illegal, vector to the
> error trap address that hasn't been initialized, and cause the machine to
> crash.
> 
> Certainly a very primitive test, to be sure.
> 
> Art
> 
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 11:51 PM, Sylvain Rousseau via Coco <
> coco at maltedmedia.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> Someone knows a snippet of code in BASIC to test a 63C09?
>> I only want to test the authenticity of the CPU, not all the instructions.
>> Regards,
>> Sylvain