[Coco] FPGA VS Software Emulators
Walter Zambotti
zambotti at iinet.net.au
Tue Jul 25 03:02:51 EDT 2017
Before I start this is not a one is better than the other debate.
This is about better understanding each technology.
Ok so my initial thoughts regarding FPGA (as I really know nothing) were
hardware simulation should
provide an end product that is more efficient and faster than a general
CPU/software emulator.
However this does not appear to be the case.
The CoCo on a chip project emulates an 8mhz CoCo.
The CoCoFPGA project a 25mhz CoCo.
And VCC on my i5 (3.3 ghz) a 133mhz CoCo.
What causes these differences in end speed?
Why are the two FPGA projects so different in speed?
Why are both FPGA solutions slower than a CPU/software solution?
Is it the particular FPGA hardware itself?
Would high end FPGAs provide a different result?
I've just download the FPGA for Dummies eBook from Altera so I'm starting my
education process.
Walter
More information about the Coco
mailing list