[Coco] The Coco3FPGA - Bringing the Color Computer 3 into the new Millenium!
dave at davebiz.com
Wed Feb 8 17:05:36 EST 2017
As long as the extra add-on contraptions do not detract from the
backward compatibility why does it really matter whether they are there
or not? As far as the CoCo3FPGA goes there are probably a lot of people
using it who don't even know what the "extra add-on contraptions" are.
The only way you would know that it's not a "simple and elegant design"
would be by looking at the Verilog source really.
On 2/8/2017 3:15 PM, Nick Marentes wrote:
> I've been suggesting this for ages.
> Rogers NanoFPGA may be the best candidate for developing a custom
> stand alone single board maybe?
> The problem is that people can't stick to the basics and we start
> seeing all these extra add-on contraptions which get little use,
> tacked on to what should be a simple and elegant design.
More information about the Coco