[Coco] CoCo3 FPGA project analog boards

[Dave Philipsen]

You might be right on that.  I'll have to ask Gary for sure but I think 
the version I have with the analog board right now is using only the 
memory on the expansion board and the onboard 512K is inaccessible.  
It's just a preliminary version though and we'll have to see what he 
comes up with.

Dave


On 4/14/2016 8:54 AM, spereira1952 at comcast.net wrote:
> If I understand what Gary has posted so far, it sounds like his CoCo3FPGA code will be updated for the new Analog Board, and it will use the memory on the Analog Board first, and the original memory on the DE-1 board with become the top-most 512K. Am I right on this?
>
> If this is so, then I'm sure that the Analog Board memory will all be fast enough for the DE-1 to run at full speed, right? Am I right to conclude that if someone had a DE-1 with the "wrong" memory chip, they could still use the Analog Board to add 4MB of full speed memory, and simply not use the slower 512K on the DE-1?
>
> Thanks,
> smp
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Zippster" <zippster278 at gmail.com>
> To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 9:19:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [Coco] CoCo3 FPGA project analog boards
>
> What Dave said with the RAM issue is the only difference I know of.
> I just bought a DE1 from Dave and it looks like a new board, I’d
> definitely see if you can get one through him to be sure it will work.
>
> At his prices the refurbished boards are a bargain. The DE1 is still available
> new from Digikey for about $160, though the RAM may have to be replaced as
> mentioned. I’m sure either Dave or I can replace the RAM chip if anyone
> needs that done.
>
> - Ed
>
>
>> On Apr 14, 2016, at 12:32 AM, Michael Brant <brant.michael.l at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ed, I think I remember hearing something about there being different DE 1
>> revisions. Do you have info on which revision or revisions are best and
>> possible where to get them to ensure I have the right one?
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
>>