[Coco] Just another peek...
Dave Philipsen
dave at davebiz.com
Fri Oct 9 23:42:27 EDT 2015
I'm just thinking out loud. Just figured if you can make a rommable system then it couldn't be that difficult to load the system in one fell swoop. No, I agree. You wouldn't want to lock out all that stuff unless it was embedded.
Dave Philipsen
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 9:44 PM, Bill Pierce via Coco <coco at maltedmedia.com> wrote:
>
> Dave, it sounds like you're off to a good start. I wish I knew more about SD cards and could help.
> I do have one question...
> You mentioned locking out the boot memory essentually making it a rom.. Why?
> This makes it impossible to modify modules (in memory) and "cobblering" a new boot. It also locks out "Xmode", "tmode", "dmode>, and "wmode" from changing descriptors on the fly.
> I'm not protesting, just wanting to know the reasoning behind locking the memory. Or am I misinterpreting your post?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill Pierce
> "Charlie stole the handle, and the train it won't stop going, no way to slow down!" - Ian Anderson - Jethro Tull
>
>
>
> My Music from the Tandy/Radio Shack Color Computer 2 & 3
> https://sites.google.com/site/dabarnstudio/
> Co-Contributor, Co-Editor for CocoPedia
> http://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
> Global Moderator for TRS-80/Tandy Color Computer Forums
> http://www.tandycoco.com/forum/
>
> E-Mail: ooogalapasooo at aol.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Philipsen <dave at davebiz.com>
> To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> Sent: Fri, Oct 9, 2015 7:59 pm
> Subject: Re: [Coco] Just another peek...
>
>
> Oh and, by the way, I'm definitely not knocking drivewire. It certainly
> has
> its place and its functions are much more than just a 'disk
> controller' but the
> SD card on the CoCo3FPGA is an order of magnitude
> faster than drivewire running
> at 115.2kbps. And rightfully so as its
> SPI interface is running at a frequency
> that is an order of magnitude
> higher than a typical serial port. It is
> especially noticable when
> you're doing disk intensive operations like
> assembling or compiling
> programs.
>
>
> Dave
>
>
> On 2015-10-09 17:49, tim
> franklinlabs.com wrote:
>> That makes sense. I was looking at the Atari 800 SOC
> for the DE1 and
>> they did the same thing. Thanks for clarifying that.
> On October 9, 2015 at 3:39 PM Dave Philipsen <dave at davebiz.com>
>> wrote:
> The wires that can be added are not a requirement. The DE1
>> evidently
> neglected to connect the card insertion switch. So if you want
>> NitrOS9
> to automatically detect when you have removed the card or
>> 'hot-plugged'
> a new one in then you need the wires. I have personally run the SD
>> card
> successfully under NitrOS9 without any wires. In that condition
>> it's
> best that you regard the SD card as non-removable unless you shut
>> OS9
> down.
>> As I mentioned before the access to the SD card is not yet
> integrated
>> into DECB. The card does work in that environment but you must
>
>> write
>> your own 'driver'. I have personally used code to access
> sectors
>> (reading and writing) from the DECB environment. In fact, I
> already
>> have the core of a program that can manage multiple 'partitions'
>
>> on
>> the
>> SD card and make them available for booting from DECB.
> Dave Philipsen
>>> On 2015-10-09 15:21, tim franklinlabs.com wrote:
> From what I understand (from the documents) the SD card only
>> works
> with
>>> Nitros9 and requires a wire to be added (not sure about the wire
>>
>> thing). Everything I read states it doesn't work with DECB (yet!
> maybe?)
>>>
>>> On October 9, 2015 at 1:27 PM Michael Brant
> <brant.michael.l at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I am also interested in knowing more
> about the SD card access as
>> i
>>> would
>>> want a stand alone
> setup.
>>> On Oct 9, 2015 2:24 PM, "Barry Nelson"
> <Barry.Nelson at amobiledevice.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I would want one of
> these, but I do not want to have to use an
>>> external
> DriveWire server. Any updates on how the SD card access is
>>> going?
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Dave Philipsen dave at davebiz.com
>>
>>>
>>>>> Fri Oct 9 10:51:34 EDT 2015
>>
>>>> It works just like the other video modes on the CoCo 3. The
> video
>>>> memory is part of the 512k memory map. In this case about
>>
>> 288,000
>>> bytes of
>>>> memory are used.
>>
>>>
>>>>> Dave Philipsen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> O/
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 1:45 AM, Brett Gordon <beretta42 at
>>> gmail.com>
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> O/ That's awesome
> Dave! So where exactly is this video memory
>>> coming from?
>>
>>> O/ ahhh.. i really want one of these now...
>>>>
>>
>>>
>>>> O/ --
>>>>
>>>> O/ Coco mailing list
>>
>>> O/ Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>>
>>>> O/
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>> --
>>>> Coco mailing list
>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>> --
> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>> --
>> Coco mailing
> list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
> --
> Coco mailing
> list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
More information about the Coco
mailing list