[Coco] sourceforge insurance

[RETRO Innovations]

   I didn't know if Hg had full history.  So, my statement should be "I
   would highly recommend a service like github (or the Mercurial
   equivalent) over other options."  To Tormond's point, no sense going to
   all the work when SaaS folks are fighting to do the work for you.

   But, I think I disagree on the "teacup" point Tormond makes.  Yes, SF
   probably won't remove things or delete them, but the community should
   decide if they "approve" of SF's direction.  Yes, companies need to pay
   the bills and monetize, but some of their recent decisions are highly
   suspicious.  By staying with SF, this group (and the project) is
   tactily approving of such actions.  If so, then fine, but understand
   that the group is indeed being judged.

   Jim

     On June 16, 2015 at 4:33 PM William Astle <lost at l-w.ca> wrote:
     In the interest if complete information, mercurial (hg) works the
     same
     way. You have the entire repository history when you clone it. That
     includes cloning the existing sourceforge repository.