[Coco] 26-3022 disk interface question
Arthur Flexser
flexser at fiu.edu
Fri Jun 12 03:09:58 EDT 2015
True. You did mention that it was 16K, but it didn't register that of
course that meant no ROM to RAM copy.
Art
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Barry Nelson <
barry.nelson at amobiledevice.com> wrote:
> Except that I am pretty sure it was mentioned in an earlier post that this
> is a 16k CoCo 2. If it had 64k of ram then that would work.
>
> On Jun 12, 2015, at 1:18 AM, coco-request at maltedmedia.com wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 17:49:51 -0400
> > From: Arthur Flexser <flexser at fiu.edu>
> > To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Coco] 26-3022 disk interface question
> > Message-ID:
> > <
> CA+LuDccPTQTkgODeXZWFv9OtmYnO4BGCzanwNBZzS2NK3yBM9Q at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >
> > Sure, you can't just load it in from cassette to the $8000 address it is
> > supposed to occupy. But a cassette program could readily be written to
> > copy the Color Basic ROM to RAM, then copy the Extended Basic code to RAM
> > at $8000 (after loading a copy in from cassette to some lower address),
> and
> > then simulate a cold start into Extended Basic. Probably not worth the
> > trouble to do so, though, since an adapter plus an EPROM, or an original
> > Extended Basic ROM, would do the job so much better.
> >
> > I recall doing something similar with Disk Basic when I still had a
> > cassette system, just out of curiosity rather than for any practical
> > benefit of having Disk Basic commands available with no controller or
> disk
> > drive for them to act on.
> >
> > Art
>
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list