[Coco] CoCoRX

[Zippster]

I guess my first instinct is to consider the FPGA based system as hardware emulation of other hardware.

But there is another way to look at it.  As different, but compatible hardware (probably the most accurate).
Just as the GIME is compatible with (or does it emulate?) circuitry in the earlier CoCos.

- Ed



> On Jun 2, 2015, at 9:14 PM, Steve Batson <steve at batsonphotography.com> wrote:
> 
> I consider it hardware if it's got hardware ports and connectors. I haven't seen the CoCoFPGA, so I don't know what it has on it. From my limited understanding of FPGAs, you are programming it to provide hardware functionality through it's internal circuits, what type of gates and other circuits it can be configured to do. So, do I consider it a real CoCo, of course not. Do I consider it real hardware, yes. I don't see it as an emulator in the sense of VCC or the other emulators. It's programable, it's emulating circuits in a sense, but doesn't really do it the same as a software emulator. 
> 
> All that said, I'm not an expert at this stuff, but it seems that if the CoCoFPGA has a cartridge port, that a diagnostic cartridge would probably at least try to work. :)
> 
> 
> On Jun 2, 2015, at 6:59 PM, Robert Gault <robert.gault at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> Steve Batson wrote:
>>> I can see the value of this for real hardware, and it does seem tricky. I'm not the person to be able to provide suggestions for it's design.  Since this is a Diagnostic tool for the hardware, not sure why there would be a concern for use with an emulator. I can certainly see the value of testing emulator features with several features that have been discussed. If this is to be a cartridge, unless it can all be done in software on the CoCo, how would it even be used with an emulator?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> So, you consider an FPGA a real Coco and not an emulator? :)
>>