[Coco] The COCO vs The Apple II

[Bill Loguidice]

There are lots of factors, but those "primitive" things you mention really
weren't all that primitive in 1977 (in fact, quite the opposite), and, as
was stated, all of those features evolved over time. You also can't
underestimate how important the available slots were in the Apple II
series. That allowed for a LOT of flexibility and those slots were taken
great advantage of.

===================================================
Bill Loguidice, Managing Director; Armchair Arcade, Inc.
<http://www.armchairarcade.com>
===================================================
Authored Books
<http://www.amazon.com/Bill-Loguidice/e/B001U7W3YS/ref=ntt_dp_epwbk_1> and
Film <http://www.armchairarcade.com/film>; About me and other ways to get
in touch <http://about.me/billloguidice>
===================================================

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Chris Osborn <fozztexx at fozztexx.com>
wrote:

>
> On Jan 10, 2015, at 12:11 AM, Tony Cappellini <cappy2112 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > How did the Apple II being having such a primitive basic, DOS, & CPU
> outsell
> > and be so much more popular than the Coco?
>
> If you don’t like DOS, you could try ProDOS.
>
> --
> Follow me on twitter: @FozzTexx
> Check out my blog: http://insentricity.com
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> https://pairlist5.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>