[Coco] OS-9 on Raspberry Pi

[Christopher R. Hawks]

On Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:26:11 -0500
Al Hartman <alhartman6 at optonline.net> wrote:

> Actually, Windows 2000 was quite good. Windows ME was the "bad"
> release, but it worked fine for me.
> 
> Someone else said Windows 9 was skipped. It wasn't. It was renamed
> Windows 10, because version checks for the Windows version would see
> Windows 9 as Windows 95/98.
> 
> Windows 8.1 with the free "Classic Shell" software works well.
> 
> -[ Al ]-

No Al, 'Cause the average Winder$ user couldn't tell if it was older or
newer than 95/98.

	That's why Win95 was introduced. The average user couldn't
tell if Win 3, Win 3.1, or Win 3.1.1 was the newest, so the next
version was Win95 (that came out in 1996).


> -----Original Message----- From: Luis Antoniosi (CoCoDemus)
> 
> It's a cycle. MS always do a good and a bad OS.
> 
> NT - good
> 2000 - bad
> XP - good
> Vista (evil)
> Win7 (great)
> Win8 (horrible)
> 
> So Win10 is expected to be fine :)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Luis Felipe Antoniosi
> 




Christopher R. Hawks
HAWKSoft
-- 
Earth is 98% full...  please delete anyone you can.