[Coco] VCC Experience

[Aaron Wolfe]

As I recall, supercomm works better as a Linux client if you set your term
to "ansi".  Some experimentation with term types and program settings may
be necessary, but you can get it working quite nicely as a Linux terminal.

Going the other direction (using Linux box to telnet into an os9 session)
is less usable.  I've never found a very good match between Linux terminal
types and os9's screen controls.  I did write a somewhat usable os9 window
server that let's you use /n devices as os9 windows, so full screen os9
controls and even graphics, but that's very alpha and sort of broken at the
moment.  I'll get it usable at some point.
 On May 25, 2014 10:02 PM, "Bill Nobel" <b_nobel at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Oh I do have both, just can’t remember which is the better for vt100.
>
> BillNobel
>
> On May 25, 2014, at 7:56 PM, Bill Pierce via Coco <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Bill, Supercomm should be on the VHD you have.
> >
> >
> > Bill Pierce
> > "Today is a good day... I woke up" - Ritchie Havens
> >
> >
> > My Music from the Tandy/Radio Shack Color Computer 2 & 3
> > https://sites.google.com/site/dabarnstudio/
> > Co-Webmaster of The TRS-80 Color Computer Archive
> > http://www.colorcomputerarchive.com/
> > Co-Contributor, Co-Editor for CocoPedia
> > http://www.cocopedia.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
> > E-Mail: ooogalapasooo at aol.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bill Nobel <b_nobel at hotmail.com>
> > To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> > Sent: Sun, May 25, 2014 9:44 pm
> > Subject: Re: [Coco] VCC Experience
> >
> >
> > Hmm, I have to break out the Supercomm now (or was it OSterm?) To use
> Telnet
> > now.
> >
> > Bill Nobel
> >
> > On May 25, 2014, at 5:43 PM, Aaron Wolfe <aawolfe at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Yep, all of the /n devices have a "virtual modem" behind them that
> >> understands all of the standard Hayes AT commands.  This lets you use
> /n as
> >> a direct replacement for standard serial devices in any OS9 telecom
> >> programs (terminal emulators, BBSes, UUCP, etc have all been tested with
> >> good results).
> >> On May 25, 2014 7:40 PM, "Bill Nobel" <b_nobel at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Are you serious?  I never would of thought that, but thinking about it.
> >>> DW4 is a serial protocol on a virtual serial port.
> >>>
> >>> Bill Nobel
> >>>
> >>> On May 25, 2014, at 5:29 PM, Aaron Wolfe <aawolfe at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On May 23, 2014 10:47 PM, "Bill Nobel" <b_nobel at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Well, after a little makefile searching, I found what I needed.  I
> >>> played
> >>>> with telnet to my raspberry pi,  for a bit, works good except vt100
> codes
> >>>> are coming through so ‘ls' breaks telnet with error 208.
> >>>>
> >>>> Using a terminal emulator works better.
> >>>>
> >>>> Supercomm is in the nitros9 project and works well.   Start it with
> /n as
> >>>> an argument, I.e.:  supercomm /n
> >>>>
> >>>> Then use the DW Hayes AT commands to connect:  ATD1.2.3.4:5678
> >>>>
> >>>> That way you'll get reasonable ansi/vt100 terminal emulation and a
> >>> channel
> >>>> where control codes won't cause issues.  Any terminal program should
> >>> work.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Coco mailing list
> >>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> >>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Coco mailing list
> >>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> >>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Coco mailing list
> >> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> >> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> >
> >
> > --
> > Coco mailing list
> > Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Coco mailing list
> > Coco at maltedmedia.com
> > http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>