[Coco] Fwd: MW-C Cross compiler bug - Solved
Luis Antoniosi (CoCoDemus)
retrocanada76 at gmail.com
Sun Mar 9 19:11:21 EDT 2014
ok it will accept:
func(400L)
but not
func(5L*80L)
or
func((long)5*80)
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Luis Antoniosi (CoCoDemus)
<retrocanada76 at gmail.com> wrote:
> and this will cause core dumped:
>
> func((long)10*80);
>
> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Luis Antoniosi (CoCoDemus)
> <retrocanada76 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ok found other bug. when you have long as parameters and you call a
>> function using a immediate:
>>
>> void func(x)
>> long x;
>> {
>> }
>>
>>
>> main()
>> {
>> func(10*80);
>> }
>>
>> I think it's still pushing an int instead of a long. If you use a long var as:
>>
>> long v;
>> v= 10*80;
>> func(v);
>>
>> it seems to work.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Jamie Cho <silurian at icloud.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks for the link! I knew it worked for me before even though it was apparently always illegal.
>>>
>>> On Mar 9, 2014, at 5:13 PM, Chris Osborn <fozztexx at fozztexx.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 9, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Are you saying that both of my copies (original and the "ANSI C" versions
>>>>> of the K&R books are wrong?
>>>>
>>>> Page 250 of my ANSI K&R 2nd Edition book says:
>>>>
>>>> void *memcpy(s,ct,n) copy n characters from ct to s, and return s.
>>>> void *memmove(s,ct,n) same as memcpy except that it works even if the objects overlap.
>>>>
>>>> So yes, you're supposed to use memmove.
>>>>
>>>> The memcpy vs. memmove saga:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/linux/misc/gcc-semibug.html
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Coco mailing list
>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Coco mailing list
>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Long live the CoCo
>
>
>
> --
> Long live the CoCo
--
Long live the CoCo
More information about the Coco
mailing list