[Coco] Back to DEF FN

[William Astle]

On 14-01-28 12:13 PM, Arthur Flexser wrote:
> My recollection is that DEF FN in Color Basic could not take a function
> name, and that Extended Basic allowed the function to be named, so that
> more than one function definition (up to 10?) could be used.  I would think
> the original usage with no function name would still be valid even with
> Extended Basic, for compatibility's sake.

Color Basic doesn't have DEF at all (not DEF FN, not DEF USR). DEF FN 
always takes a function name. You must be thinking of USR.