[Coco] Glenside IDE problem
Gene Heskett
gheskett at wdtv.com
Wed Dec 10 23:55:50 EST 2014
On Wednesday 10 December 2014 23:08:02 Bill Nobel did opine
And Gene did reply:
> > On Dec 10, 2014, at 1:09 PM, Gene Heskett <gheskett at wdtv.com> wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Next question, whats the rbf.d definition for the length of the
> > device name? No. In os9.d M$NAME reservation is only 2 bytes, but
> > since that included alphabetical chars, one could us iA to iG, with
> > suitable offsets
>
> Actually Gene the M$NAME in the module header is just a pointer to the
> actual name in the module. The name itself can be of any length as it
> is High bit terminated on the last character.
I am aware of that, however the device table entry for the devices name in
the defs is only 2 characters. If one is assembling a device descriptor
I'd imagine the assembler would allow you to name it /CandiceFudpucker,
but I'd about bet that in the device table, you could only find the Ca.
But this is a head scratcher, at that address in memory, ONLY the 3 floppy
entries are there, and I dumped an extra 256 bytes on both sides of that
$7500.
That leads to : does the rbsuper devices have their own drive table?
Puzzling. For rbsuper managed stuffs, I have DD, S1, & SH but those don't
appear to be in _this_ drive table.
> > filled in for 8 partitions. But at some point, the drive device
> > table would overflow too. That FWIW, is 22 byte or more for the 1st
> > DD.SIZ bytes of each entry in the device table, plus 18 more bytes
> > for the rest of that drives table entry for $1E bytes per table
> > entry.
> >
> > D.DevTbl is stored at $80 in the direct page, which on my L2 machine
> > says it is located at $7500. That would be in the 4th dat slot and
> > makes -0 sense. It had better be in block 0 not block 1($2000-3FFF)
> > or block 2($4000-5FFF) but in block 3($6000-7FFF).
> >
> > But I have not found an entry limitation yet.
> >
> > But that right there blows what I know about Level 3 right out of the
> > water. Bill Nobel, is my tracing correct?
> >
> > From a dmem dump of my L2 DAT record in the DP:
> > {t2|08}/DD/NITROS9/3.3.0/6309L2/MODULES/RBF:dmem 0 90 10|dump
> >
> > Address 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 0 2 4 6 8 A C E
> > -------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----------------
> > 00000000 6C00 0900 0900 0000 0315 1203 00FC 0000 l............|..
> >
> > I yam confused. Can someone clarify?
> >
> > Besides, my wood arrived about an hour ago so I've other things to do
> > the rest of the day.
>
> Your tracing is pretty darn close Gene. DP and block 0 are core data
> needed for OS9 core operation. Data pointers like D.DevTbl and such
> can point to another block in the System map. Remember the System gets
> it’s own 64k workspace. All the data pointers are created during the
> boot process using system memory requests which allocate memory in the
> system map, and those pointers are stored in DP. D.DevTbl on my 3.3.0
> is $6B00. IOMAN allocates this memory based on the DevCnt and PollCnt
> from the INIT module.
>
> L3 on the other hand from what I am beginning to understand is using
> blocks 1 & 2 of the System map to swap in the memory blocks for
> SCF/RBF modules and pulling them out of the System memory itself.
> Nitros9 module at boot moves them out of System map and IOMAN manages
> swapping them in/out as needed. Alan is using block 0 in the area of
> $0642-$064f(?) as his data pointer area for L3 (block #’s and
> pointers)
>
> Bill Nobel
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
US V Castleman, SCOTUS, Mar 2014 is grounds for Impeaching SCOTUS
More information about the Coco
mailing list