[Coco] 6809 compilers

[tim at franklinlabs.com]

I looked at your code and can tell you it wont assemble it. The code written is
for OS9 and you need an assembler that' knows the OS9 links (or at least the
libraries). The source also has many directives which are not supported by
Dunfield. The code would need serious changes to assemble correctly using the
Dunfield package.




On August 6, 2014 at 9:38 PM Kandur <k at qdv.pw> wrote:
> Thank you Tim,
> I found the MC314PC1.ZIP file.
> "The DDS MICRO-C Compiler Dunfield Development Systems (DDS) MICRO-C is a
> compact,
> portable compiler suitable for code development targeting small 8 or 16 bit
> systems.
> At the time of this writing, versions of the compiler are available which
> produce code for the
> 68HC08, 6809, 68HC11, 68HC12, 68HC16, 8051/52, 8080/85/Z80, 8086 and 8096
> processor families."
> Would you mind to check if it is indeed suitable to compile my source files
> here please?
> http://qdv.pw/eng/_text/Coco/lrt-sb.zip
>
> Kandur
>
> Wednesday, August 6, 2014, 4:21:15 PM, you wrote:
> > Personally, I use the Dunfield Development System. It's a 6809 C Compiler
> > and
> > assembler/linker. It works pretty well and the C compiler creates pretty
> > good
> > code. There's no optimization so speak of.
>
>
> > On August 6, 2014 at 7:07 PM Kandur <k at qdv.pw> wrote:
> >> In the very early 80s, I used the Micro Works SDS80C
> >> editor + assembler + monitor cartridge, to assemble 6809 binaries.
> >> I still have this cartridge: http://qdv.pw/coco/?p=213
> >> Surely in 2014 must be a better way to compile sources
> >> on a powerful windows machine. Any suggestions?
> >> Thanks.
>
> >> Kandur
>
> >> --
> >> Coco mailing list
> >> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> >> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco