[Coco] Suppose, for a moment, I were to make some changes to HDB-DOS.

[Luis Antoniosi (CoCoDemus)]

what about the cassette buffer ? $01da

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:59 PM, T. Franklin <tim at franklinlabs.com> wrote:
> What language are you writing in? It matters. If it's DECB you can used the CLEAR statement and put the stack lower and use the memory from $7fff to the top of the stack pointer. If it's assemblers/machine language, put it where ever you want as the lower memory is defined by DECB and would become undefined when you execute your assembly. program. If you are using assembly function calls while in DECB just let the assembler assign the location relative to your program. If it's only a few bytes then there shouldn' be a problem letting the assembler assign the location. It will put it near the program it's self as long as you don't use the ORG directive.
>
> That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it!!!
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juan Castro [mailto:jccyc1965 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 02:18 PM
> To: 'CoCo List'
> Subject: [Coco] Suppose, for a moment,  I were to make some changes to HDB-DOS.
>
> And suppose I needed a new low RAM variable to store a setting for a newfunctionality I'm writing.What would be the best course of action? I imagine page 0 must becompletely full, but there's that DECB variable area where graphics page 0used to be. It's just a couple of bytes.Juan--Coco mailing listCoco at maltedmedia.comhttp://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco



-- 
Long live the CoCo