[Coco] Success! Re: HDB-DOS build fixes. Untested as of yet.

[Juan Castro]

OK. All I have to do is reapply the changes marked "4 weeks ago" and "7
weeks ago" here:

http://toolshed.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/toolshed/toolshed/log/5882dfba6b5c/hdbdos/dwread.asm
http://toolshed.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/toolshed/toolshed/log/5882dfba6b5c/hdbdos/dwwrite.asm

I'm posting this here mostly as a reminder to myself, but also for others
to cross-check.

On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:16 PM, David Ladd <drencor at gamepixel.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Juan Castro <jccyc1965 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes, that was it, I think. I copied Robert's versions over. Those must
> > have been changed from an earlier revision.
> >
> > Anyway, it's fixable. The server keeps a history of all changes. No
> > information is lost.
> >
> > Juan,
>
> Its no biggy as long as it can be fixed. :D
>
> I have been sick the last week and a half and haven't been on hardly at all
> so I wasn't able to really warn anyone of my changes.  I think  Bill,
> Aaron, Boisy, and LostWizard are the only ones who knew about the changes I
> have been doing.
>
>  Also the HDBDOS dwread.asm and dwwrite.asm were taken from NitrOS-9's
> files for sure.  The thing is the way NitrOS-9 uses returned values and
> HDBDOS is slightly dif.  The Becker routine that was in the NitrOS-9 repo
> would not work correctly in HDBDOS, but worked fine in NitrOS-9.  So I only
> made changes to the HDBDOS version since it really didn't need updating for
> NitrOS-9.
>
> Though to keep things more alike I should apply my changes to the becker
> routine on NitrOS-9 and also put my code for J&M CP FDC's parallel port in
> there too so at least it is ready.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dave
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>