[Coco] Message sizes

[Robert Hermanek]

My 2 cents, I'd say that 100k might be a more useful limit--it would still 
download quickly for dial up users, but would allow for the casual posting 
of schematics/etc when the need arises.  Pretty easy to keep any image below 
100k if you watch your quality settings...

-Robert Hermanek

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dennis Bathory-Kitsz" <dennis-ix at maltedmedia.com>
To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2012 11:06 AM
Subject: [Coco] Message sizes


> Hi all,
>
> Just a note about message size and format.
>
> FYI, the mailman server is set to strip HTML and forward only text 
> messages. So if you send HTML and expect anybody to see it, they won't.
>
> Also, the message size limit is 40K. We still have dialup members and also 
> those who don't care for attachments in their messages. I've just rejected 
> two large messages this morning.
>
> If you have an attachment and don't have a place to put it, you can upload 
> it to ftp://maltedmedia.com/incoming/ and email me personally with that 
> info. I'll move it to the NEWLY_RECEIVED directory and you can link it 
> there.
>
> On the other hand, if you think I should increase the message size limit, 
> I can do that. But I won't if there are any objections.
>
> Please keep the discussion off the list, and let me know PRIVATELY at my 
> email address above if you object and I'll leave the size limit alone.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dennis
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>