[Coco] MAKE_TK.lzh has a bad case of Y2K.
gene heskett
gheskett at wdtv.com
Mon May 30 13:19:33 EDT 2011
On Monday, May 30, 2011 01:08:00 PM Stephen H. Fischer did opine:
> Hi,
>
> I have discovered that MAKE_TK.lzh on RTSI is unusable.
>
> I would like confirmation that it really is bad.
>
> In trying to go back to the previous make that I used, I cannot find the
> DOC's for it.
>
> And it does not like the makefile I tried to give to it.
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> =CC -r -e=3 archive.p1.c*
> =CC -r -e=3 archive.p2.c*
> =CC -r -e=3 archive.p3.c*
> =CC -r -e=3 archive.p4.c*
> =CC -e=3 -f=archive archive.p1.r archive.p2.r archive.p3.r
> archive.p4.r -l=/dd/lib/cos9.l*
> checking for implicit relocatable files
> file: archive.p1.r
> checking for implicit source files
> file: archive.p1.r
> no explicit source file listed
> make: can't find source file to make "archive.p1.r"
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> 0 1987/02/10 11:32 --e-rewr 480 3C9C Make
>
> Header for: make
> Module size: $3C9C #15516
> Module CRC: $41F1F2 (Good)
> Hdr parity: $88
> Exec. off: $001B #27
> Data Size: $1A77 #6775
> Edition: $12 #18
>
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> archive.p1.r: archive.h archive.p1.c
> =CC -r -e=3 archive.p1.c*
>
> archive.p2.r: archive.h archive.p2.c
> =CC -r -e=3 archive.p2.c*
>
> archive.p3.r: archive.h archive.p3.c
> =CC -r -e=3 archive.p3.c*
>
> archive.p4.r: archive.h archive.p4.c
> =CC -r -e=3 archive.p4.c*
>
> /DD/CMDS/archive: archive.p1.r archive.p2.r archive.p3.r archive.p4.r
> =CC -e=3 -f=archive archive.p1.r archive.p2.r archive.p3.r
> archive.p4.r -l=/dd/lib/cos9.l*
>
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> I suspect that it came from Delphi but my listings of all my Delphi
> disks are AWOL.
>
> If there are additional make(s) available, please tell me about them.
>
> I suspect that at this time ALL are bad.
>
> And have been for > 10 years and no one has said anything.
Tim Kientzle's make is the only "make" for os9 that I have ever been aware
of that worked. ISTR there was something called Make in the dev pack kit,
but it was little more than a script IIRC. ISTR it worked for the examples
in the kit, but would have needed heavy editing for a "power user".
And while I have had some canned Makefile's that worked flawlessly with
Tims make, my understanding of the interactions of a Makefile have
conspired to make me use cc-2.5.2 as it is much much easier to configure,
for me at least. No idea where I missed it, but lisp and I, even in my
amiga days, were never on a first name basis, and that is what a Makefile
for Tims make reminds me of.
Tim is still around I believe, but I've no idea how to contact him today,
and haven't googled for him in 5 or so years now.
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
<http://tinyurl.com/ddg5bz>
<http://www.cantrip.org/gatto.html>
Hey, what do you expect from a culture that *drives* on *parkways* and
*parks* on *driveways*?
-- Gallagher
More information about the Coco
mailing list