[Coco] MESS needs a C++ programmer dedicated to the Coco

Luis Fernández luis46coco at hotmail.com
Sun May 1 21:07:05 EDT 2011


That's what I need to throw games from my utility cocodskutil

indeed, no emulator can handle I / O sector / track directly?

> Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 11:18:16 -0500
> To: coco at maltedmedia.com
> From: operator at coco3.com
> Subject: Re: [Coco] MESS needs a C++ programmer dedicated to the Coco
> 
> At 08:57 AM 5/1/2011, you wrote:
> >As you users of MESS know, changes come so fast that our portion of 
> >the emulation gets lost in the dust. There apparently no longer is 
> >anyone on the MESS team that spends any significant time on Coco 
> >emulation unless there is a major crash. As a result, the most 
> >recent versions of MESS don't work as well as older ones. 
> >Unfortunately, older versions are missing some of the corrections 
> >found in more recent versions.
> >
> >As Tveo's recent message demonstrates there are Coco enthusiasts who 
> >can handle the MESS source code. I, for one, can't so am unable to 
> >make some of the changes/corrections currently needed.
> >For example, if you mount a custom disk ROM in the cart slot, it 
> >prevents disk I/O or the smartwatch functions from working. The fdc 
> >index bit reporting for type I and IV commands no longer works. MESS 
> >no longer permits ignoring ROMs with crc's that don't match the 
> >standards built into the driver code. We need support for acceptance 
> >of new entries in the hash files .hsi or .xml so that custom disk 
> >ROMs or even game paks no on these lists can be used.
> >
> >Any takers? There is a MESS BBS at
> >http://forums.bannister.org/ubbthreads.php?ubb=postlist&Board=1
> 
> 
> Although I use the emulator a lot in my IDEs, I use VCC more for 
> casual use because it's just makes more sense to launch a more 
> compact and friendly emulator.
> 
> After trying to keep up with their updates for probably 8 to 10 years 
> now, I'm convinced that the M.E.S.S. team couldn't have picked a more 
> accurate name for the system.  I can't complain about what all it 
> does for free but when you start seeing performance decrease while 
> PC's keep getting more memory and becoming much faster, I just don't 
> get it.  I think part of the problem is contributor burnout.  What 
> started out being a team of a few geeks became a large unorganized 
> team of contributors.  If everyone isn't on the same page at all 
> times, things fall apart.
> 
> At some point you have to ask yourself, why use M.E.S.S. on a casual 
> basis when VCC is a much more pleasant experience.
> 
> Speaking of VCC... it needs command line arguments so we can launch 
> it from an IDE with virtual disks or ROMs mounted.
> 
> -- 
> ~ Roger Taylor
> 
> 
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
 		 	   		  


More information about the Coco mailing list