[Coco] Preserving old CoCo diskettes...

[Roger Taylor]

At 09:39 PM 5/18/2010, you wrote:
>Roger,
>
>What driver is version of CoCoNet 1.07 using? That was 4 minutes and 
>14 seconds.
>
>I agree with your statement on data loss. Darn it, we agreed again... :)
>
>Regards,
>
>Mark


No, we don't agree on anything, especially the part about you wanting 
your change back.  I just hope both of you are not democrats.  ;)

Like I said, the gloves are off.  Ya'll set'em up.  I'll knock'em down.

Now you're blurring my CoCoNet product with the complimentary build 
of NitrOS-9 on the pak that was using the early Drive Pak driver.  I 
think early on it was also repeatedly said that any NitrOS-9 images 
on the pak's card would not be the product itself and that it was a 
work in progress as well so I could actually take the time to build 
the paks, which I've sold a lot of.  On top of all that... you're 
benchmarking the response time of OS-9 along with the pak, which 
combined can affect each other.  And You Know This Very Well.

On top of THAT, I don't mind you posting that the later drivers 
result in 2:07 which I am about to further cut in half to 1:0x, and 
this is with the CPU stepped down to 1mhz during sector transfers.



-- 
~ Roger Taylor