[Coco] Internet via Coco

[James Dessart]

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:24 PM, coco wal <cocowal6809 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thats not too bad , so your down to 4 maybe 6 address bytes for a
> bussed Ethernet controller ? Using the indirect approach that you mentioned
> would still be much more efficient then a talking to a
> SPI Ethernet controller . Again this is all academic , i think you would
> struggle to keep up with the network data no matter what interface was
> implemented :)

The C64 can handle it, apparently. That's the system Contiki was
originally designed for.

-- 
James Dessart
<http://ideaoubliette.blogspot.com/>