[Coco] Multi-Pak Interface question.

[Rick Taylor]

Has anyone ever made Multi-Pak clones? Would it be legal to do so?

On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Bob Devries <devries.bob at gmail.com> wrote:

> The PAK which failed with the MPI upgrade was the one which came with the
> first version of CocoMax. Its address was at $FF90 IIRC, which is the same
> as the Coco3's GIME chip registers.
>
> --
> Regards, Bob Devries, Dalby, Queensland, Australia
>
> Isaiah 50:4 The sovereign Lord has given me
> the capacity to be his spokesman,
> so that I know how to help the weary.
>
> website: http://www.home.gil.com.au/~bdevasl
> my blog: http://bdevries.invigorated.org/
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "J.P. Samson" <
> jps.subscriptions at gmail.com>
> To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts" <coco at maltedmedia.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [Coco] Multi-Pak Interface question.
>
>
>
>  On Mar 3, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Ryan Pritchard wrote:
>>
>>> If one were to acquire a 26-3024 MPI that had the PAL upgrade to run with
>>> the CoCo3, would it still work on a CoCo 1 or CoCo 2?
>>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> The caveat being there was one known pak that would be broken with the PAL
>> upgrade, but I can't remember which.  It wasn't a common pak, to  be sure.
>>
>> -- JP
>>
>>
>> --
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>



-- 
All of this machinery making modern music can still be open hearted -
not so coldly charted; it's really just a question of your honesty.

- Neil Peart, Rush, _The Spirit of Radio_