[Coco] success with DCom

[Wayne Campbell]

I never thought of that. I'll see what happens. Thanks!




________________________________
From: Ron Bihler <rbihler at msn.com>
To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts <coco at maltedmedia.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 2:32:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Coco] success with DCom

Wayne Campbell wrote:
> I have (re-?)learned a few things in the last few weeks. First, the byte I had to change to make the DCom disk image recognized by NitrOS-9 is the # of tracks. $07 is a 720K 80-Track, and $03 is a 360K 40-Track. Fortunately, making that change didn't affect the readability of the disk image.
>
> The second thing I learned is that Basic09 01.01.00 is a re-write of the Dragon Basic09 (not sure if it's just L1 or both L1 & L2) that Boisy Pitre and others worked on. There were changes made to DATE$ to accomodate the Y2K requirements.
>
> RunB, of the same version number, seems to have a bug. I can't decompile anything running DCom from the OS-9 command line, but I can by running Basic09 and running DCom from within it.
>
> I have successfully decompiled DCom. Now I have the task of trying to invent new variable names to replace the DCom generic names. Once that's done, I'm ready to place DCom in the public domain.
>
> Wayne
>
>
>
>      
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>
>  
Wayne

If you using the version of runb that was on the dcom disk it will 
work.  There is something different between the runb versions, I ran 
into the same problem trying to dcom RiBBS, if I ran Dcom within Nitros 
or LV2 it would crash.  But when I moved the Runb supplied with Dcom to 
the Cmds Dir ran just fine. 

Ron


--
Coco mailing list
Coco at maltedmedia.com
http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco