[Coco] CoCo 1 64K upgrade failed :(.
    Ryan Pritchard 
    coconut at pritchard.ca
       
    Fri Sep 26 17:12:57 EDT 2008
    
    
  
On further reviewing the Datasheets say 128 refresh cycles/2ms, so because
it says so, I am not going to bother to understand the logic.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Ryan Pritchard <coconut at pritchard.ca>wrote:
> I don't understand why the SAM is only refreshing at 128 cycles.  You have
> 8 address bits getting latched on RAS and then the next 8 bit being latched
> on CAS.   Wouldn't 8 address bits mean 256 cycles?  Or is the refresh
> occuring for 2 rows per cycle?
>
>
-- 
Regards,
Ryan Pritchard
Fun Extends All Basic Life Expectancies
    
    
More information about the Coco
mailing list