[Coco] New Texas IT Requirement
KARL SEFCIK
cdiman7 at flash.net
Tue Jul 15 02:36:18 EDT 2008
John,
I'll look again, but the media has gotten things
wrong before, and just ran with it in the wrong
direction. The bill is written in legaleze, and a lot
is hard to read cause so much is crossed out, but what
I saw was for alarm monitor and Securoity contractors
not having a criminal background (they listed all the
ways to have one too).
But we wouldn't want the media to be the fool, like
remember Hurricane Jeanne? The name was a variation of
Jeannie, and should have been pronounced as such, but
from the start, it was pronounced Jean. And I think we
already had Gene that year too.
And Lego blocks, are Leggo, but one G should make
the E long, like Leego, but from the get go, the E is
short.
So who didn't do their research on these? The media,
and I'll keep checking, but so far, I've only seen a
reference to data used for alarm or security
applications.
Thnaks for the reply though.
Karl
--- John Donaldson <johnadonaldson at sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
> Karl,
> It's there, otherwise so many articles about
> would not have been
> written about it.
> Do a Google search of "Texas IT PI Law" and look at
> how many articles
> there are about this law.
>
> John Donaldson
>
> --
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list