[Coco] Possible CoCo Bulletin Board forum
Gene Heskett
gene.heskett at verizon.net
Thu Dec 25 23:39:02 EST 2008
On Thursday 25 December 2008, Steven Hirsch wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> It's seriously difficult to kill data on a DLT cartridge. I've
>>> personally seen cases where tapes run over a bulk eraser were still
>>> readable! The drives use read-after-write to ensure integrity and will
>>> redo any blocks that fail CRC (up to a limit). The lack of read-back is
>>> a serious issue for the rotary-head transports which are mechanically
>>> incapable of it (at least AFAIK).
>>
>> Bulk erasers don't have the cajones to erase a data or vieo tape unless it
>> says Garner on it.
>
>Ah. Now I know what to look for! I've been using an older Nortronics
>unit intended for reel-to-reel audio tape. Whenever I have to wipe a data
>cartridge, I place a U-shaped piece of steel over the top to focus the
>flux lines. Buzzes like a b*tch, but gets the job done :-).
>
>> Anyway, the virtual tapes, on a 500GB hard drive, are many times more
>> dependable, I've not lost a byte since. And I don't worry about backups,
>> I have a user named amanda who runs herself evey morning at a little after
>> 1 and does all that without any interference from me.
>
>I would be very concerned about putting all my eggs in one basket like
>that. My working theory on hard drives is that there are two types:
>
>Those that have failed already and those that are about to.
I tend to agree, but it has also been my experience that if one peruses the
logs, you will see an error or 30 before they drop over. I use that for a
hint to get my butt to town and get another drive and copy it to the new
drive, before the failure is total. I have done that twice since 2001 when I
switched.
>That's why data-retention experts recommend against using RAID for
>archival purposes, BTW. Just because the chances of losing >1 drive in a
>RAID-5 array are infinitesmal does not mean it cannot happen.
Particularly if they are Velociraptors, one fellow on lkml has in the last
month lost all 5 of them in his raid.
>I didn't realize that rotary head devices were capable of supporting
>read-after-write. Thanks for the update!
With enough $$ thrown at the head, it can be done. The dvc-pro also does this
unless its doing an insert mode. IIRC the normal record head is then the
erase head because its track is a few microns narrower, and the confidence
head actually writes the new data. I think.
>Steve
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
What orators lack in depth they make up in length.
More information about the Coco
mailing list