[Coco] [Color Computer] RE: [CoCo] Atari and Amiga comparison
wdg3rd at comcast.net
wdg3rd at comcast.net
Thu Mar 15 11:14:38 EDT 2007
From: Roger Merchberger <zmerch-coco at 30below.com>
> Rumor has it that Frank Pittel may have mentioned these words:
> >On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 03:22:02PM -0400, RJRTTY at aol.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >I've often wondered what things would have been like if the coco had
> >been built around a 68000 unstead of a 6809.
>
> Very Late?
>
> ;-)
>
> The CoCo in it's original incarnation was released in 1979, methinks the
> 68K wasn't even a gleam in Daddy Motorola's eye yet... ;-)
The Color Computer was announced July 31, 1980 along with the Vidtex terminal, the Model 3 and the Pocket Computer PC-1. The 68000 was being used in several machines by then, mostly on S-100 boards -- Sage comes to mind.
--
Ward Griffiths wdg3rd at comcast.net
Carjacking or impoundment? We now have two vocabularies for wrongs, depending on whether private persons or government agents commit them. This is the difference between mass murder and national defense. Between extortion and taxation. Between counterfeiting and inflation. And so on. Other examples will occur to the astute reader. Joseph Sobran
>
> The CoCo3 [1] might not have been as widespread as it was if they'd chosen
> to design around the 68K, mainly because 1) if they emulated the 6809,
> legacy software would've run slower than stock CoCos, or 2) the computer
> wouldn't have been compatible with the large installed base of CoCos that
> existed at the time.
>
> Laterz,
> Roger "Merch" Merchberger
>
> --
> Roger "Merch" Merchberger | "Bugs of a feather flock together."
> sysadmin, Iceberg Computers | Russell Nelson
> zmerch at 30below.com |
>
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
More information about the Coco
mailing list