[Coco] [coco] video signal generation
RJRTTY at aol.com
RJRTTY at aol.com
Fri Jan 5 17:09:57 EST 2007
In a message dated 1/5/07 3:28:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
gene.heskett at verizon.net writes:
>>Y ou may want to consider changing the electrolytic to ceramic if the
>> value is not to high. Albeit somewhat expensive, ceramic caps to about
>> 10 uF are available.
>>
>I've not found them to be terribly dependable James. Very low tolerance
>for any overvoltage. The Panasonic dvc-pro's had a few of those here and
>there, and the failure rates were about 20% of the teeny little surface
>mount electrolytics around them. So we carried them on the shelf too.
>Smallish qtys of course, but then we were buying the electrolytics on 100
>count tapes toward the last of my tenure in that chair. The electrolytic
>failures were opens and high esr's, generally non-destructive, the
>ceramics crowbared, so we noticed the destruction quickly. Things get
>interesting when you have to figure out which trace in a 6 layer board
>goes where so you can jumper the burnout. I gave up and started
>replacing the whole board after a while, it was quicker.
>I could say do it, but use ones rated at least 2x the supply voltage. 6
>volters on a 5 volt line don't cut it for the long haul.
Well I am going to include the input filter since it does work even
if it is the cap on the GIME's supply line. I have to build for the
worst case situation were the cap is bad and the customer has
no interest in replacing it.
Also I have personally tried the converter on a half dozen different machines
and have gotten feedback from customers and in every case the behavior is
the same. You would think that with random failures at least a few would
still have good supply caps on the GIME.
Roy
More information about the Coco
mailing list