[Coco] Cubix and Coco3 - code snippet
jdaggett at gate.net
jdaggett at gate.net
Wed Feb 7 09:09:09 EST 2007
Robert
About a year ago I looked indepth at the Cubix software and did not really find
any assembly issues other than the "ssr" assembler directive wihich is a direct
jump into the OS kernal. That would be the most tidious to alter with a macro.
The real issue is not getting the code into a form that any Coco assembler or
crossassembler can handle. The eral issues are writing peripheral drivers and
such around the main OS core that would work with the COCO1/2/3.
james
On 7 Feb 2007 at 9:01, Robert Gault wrote:
> Gary Zwan wrote:
> > Forgive me gents (and ladies?),
> >
> > Don't really know how to respond to the archive list so it stays in
> > the thread.
> >
> > Here is a portion of the 'command.os' file from cubix:
> >
> > it lost some of the formatting between Winderz notepad
> > and Xandros Kate(?).
> >
> >
> ><snip>
> > Gary
> >
> >
>
> The only item in that piece of code that is not identical to EDTASM
> syntax is FCCZ.
>
> All you need to do is change all FCCZ to FCC and then add a
> terminating FCB. For example.
>
> FCCZ 'Formatting '
> is the same as
> FCC 'Formatting '
> FCB 0
>
> Now I may have guessed wrong on this as there is also a FCS pseudo-op
> which adds $80 to the last character in an FCC string. But if this is
> the only difference between Cubix source code syntax and EDTASM
> syntax, this is a tempest in a teapot.
>
> --
> Coco mailing list
> Coco at maltedmedia.com
> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.29/673 - Release Date:
> 2/6/2007 5:52 PM
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list