[Coco] (very very slightly OT) 6800 emulator
wdg3rd at comcast.net
wdg3rd at comcast.net
Mon Apr 30 23:28:15 EDT 2007
If you have the "more powerful" processor, that's the one you make and sell. You develop the next generation with the tools you have. That means running a semblance of the next processor at 10% of its eventual speed. Or did you think the 8008 was built with 80386 CAD systems that wouldn't exist for a decade and some later?
The 6800 was designed mostly by _hand_ (and mind and HP calculator and drafting pencil). It was used to build the 6809 and the 68000, which would have been real tricky without appropriate tool evolution.
--
Ward Griffiths wdg3rd at comcast.net
The reason folks don't think of installing Windows as a painful experience is roughly the same reason men don't think of childbirth as a painful experience. Mike, http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/03/30/letters_3003/
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Manney <mannslists at invigorated.org>
> Well, I thought that normally the 'host' processor had to be more
> powerful than the emulated processor to handle the emulation?
More information about the Coco
mailing list