[Coco] [----] Re: Error codes on SECB

Sat Nov 18 16:13:16 EST 2006

On Saturday 18 November 2006 15:44, Jim Cox wrote:
>SA = Spam Assassin?  Do you run your own mail server?
>
No.  I use fetchmail to suck it from vz to a scratch file, polling their 
pop server every 90 seconds, then procmail to filter it and mark it by 
piping it thru spamd, putting the result in another scratch file unless 
its one of two blacklisted sources which get dropped on the floor near 
the drain, and kmail then reads that file and puts each piece of mail in 
the appropriate folder, truncating the scratch file to zero length as it 
goes..  JunqueMail currently has 205 messages in it, cleaned out earlier 
this morning.  Its been weeks since I had a false positive unless one 
person from an .ru address posts to lkml, and I've been feeding that to 
the ham trainer so thats gradualy going away.  some gets thru, but not a 
lot, maybe 2 since I last cleaned house.  They get moved to a 'spam' 
folder & "sa_learn spam $DIRTOSCAN" gets to look them over so it doen't 
make that mistake too many times.


>On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:30:01 -0500
>
>  Gene Heskett <gene.heskett at verizon.net> wrote:
>> On Saturday 18 November 2006 14:52, Jim Cox wrote:
>>>Note that some where in this thread, that the subject was
>>>appended with the name of a certain canned meat and was
>>>trapped in my filters.  It may be trapped in other
>>>peoples
>>>filters too.
>>
>> Humm, hasn't happened here Jim, and SA is doing a quite
>>decent job
>> overall.
>>
>>>-Jim
>>>
>>>On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 01:07:35 -0600
>>>
>>>  "Bill Collins" <bilge at motleydeercamp.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm glad you asked the question Mark.  I've been
>>>>following along (as best I
>>>> can) and I was wondering the same thing.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Bill
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: "Mark Mellor" <markmbm at jps.net>
>>>> To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts"
>>>><coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>>> Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2006 1:01 AM
>>>> Subject: [SPAM] Re: [Coco] Error codes on SECB
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, I realized after I sent the email that the ECB
>>>>>part probably
>>>>> stands
>>>>> for Extended Color Basic.  Anyway, it looks like you
>>>>>have solved the
>>>>> mystery.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mark
>>>>>
>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> From: "William Astle" <lost at l-w.ca>
>>>>> To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts"
>>>>><coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>>>> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:45 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Coco] Error codes on SECB
>>>>>
>>>>>> Mark Mellor wrote:
>>>>>> > What does SECB stand for?  In my book it says "File
>>>>>>
>>>>>>not found" for the
>>>>>
>>>>> NE
>>>>>
>>>>>> > error but it looks like you already know that with
>>>>>>
>>>>>>your sample code.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> SECB=Super Extended Color Basic
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is, "Extended Basic 2.0" from a CoCo3.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Mark
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> > From: "Diego Barizo" <diegoba at adinet.com.uy>
>>>>>> > To: "CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts"
>>>>>>
>>>>>><coco at maltedmedia.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 9:07 PM
>>>>>> > Subject: Re: [Coco] Error codes on SECB
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> I checked on the "Quick reference guide" and the NE
>>>>>>
>>>>>>error is not
>>>>>
>>>>> listed.
>>>>>
>>>>>> >> Also, this short program gives no number
>>>>>> >> 10  ON ERR GOTO 1000
>>>>>> >> 20 LOAD"PPPP"
>>>>>> >> 30 STOP
>>>>>> >> 1000 ? ERNO,ERLIN
>>>>>> >> 1010 END
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> If I change line 20 for WOAD "PP" I get the expected
>>>>>>
>>>>>>results for an SN
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > error
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> BUT... If after the first program ends, I type ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>ERNO, I do get 26 as
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> answer... :-/
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> William Astle wrote:
>>>>>> >>> Diego Barizo wrote:
>>>>>> >>>> While debugging a program, I noticed that some
>>>>>>
>>>>>>errors just don't
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>> generate an error code, like "NE error"
>>>>>> >>>> Is there anywhere I could "peek" to identify this
>>>>>>
>>>>>>error?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>> And out of curiosity, does anyone know why some
>>>>>>
>>>>>>errors are not
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > included?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>>> ( I seen to remember another error that did not
>>>>>>
>>>>>>generate an error
>>>>>
>>>>> code,
>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>> but just can't remember which one)
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> I thought NE was error code 26 (Unravelled book
>>>>>>
>>>>>>confirms.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Interestingly
>>>>>
>>>>>> >>> enough, NE is defined by Extended Basic even though
>>>>>>
>>>>>>most folks would
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>> only encounter it when using Disk Basic.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> Unless you're doing something odd, all errors go
>>>>>>
>>>>>>through the same
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>> handling process so ERRNO should provide the error
>>>>>>
>>>>>>code (assuming ON
>>>>>
>>>>> ERR
>>>>>
>>>>>> >>> GOTO in effect). The only special handling I see in
>>>>>>
>>>>>>the error
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >>> routines
>>>>>> >>> is for some weird case of a UL error. (Note that if
>>>>>>
>>>>>>you aren't doing
>>>>>
>>>>> ON
>>>>>
>>>>>> >>> ERR GOTO, you won't get the error code stored
>>>>>>
>>>>>>anywhere.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>> >> Coco mailing list
>>>>>> >> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>>>> >> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> William Astle
>>>>>> finger lost at l-w.ca for further information
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Geek Code V3.12: GCS/M/S d- s+:+ !a C++ UL++++$ P++ L+++
>>>>>>!E W++ !N w---
>>>>>> !D !M PS PE V-- Y+ PGP t+@ 5++ X !R tv+@ b+++@ !DI D? G
>>>>>>e++ h+ y?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Coco mailing list
>>>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Coco mailing list
>>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>>>>> Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.14.6/536 -
>>>>>Release Date: 11/16/2006
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Coco mailing list
>>>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>
>> --
>> Cheers, Gene
>> "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
>> soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
>> -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
>> Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to
>>the above
>> message by Gene Heskett are:
>> Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights
>>reserved.
>>
>> --
>> Coco mailing list
>> Coco at maltedmedia.com
>> http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.