[Coco] Trouble with OmniFlop
Alex Evans
alxevans at concentric.net
Sun May 28 23:53:26 EDT 2006
On May 28, 2006, at 5:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Alex Evans wrote:
>> On May 28, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Mike Pepe wrote:
>>> 3.5" disks are 96tpi regardless of their capacity. 5.25" disks
>>> are 48tpi if the 40 track variety, 96tpi if the 80 track variety.
>> Actually most 3.5" floppies are 192tpi, though I do have a 40
>> track 3.5" floppy drive which is 96tpi.
>
> wrong...
>
> In fact, all 3.5" floppy drives are 135tpi, even the oddball
> variable speed drives some macs used in times past. The difference
> is that drivers wrongly assume they have to double step some
> drives. This is generally a symptom of the descriptor for that
> drive being miss-configured. If that particular drive software
> actually uses a descriptor, rsdos and most of its ilk do not.
Sorry, but what about a very strange 40 track HP 3.5" floppy drive
that I have? I am pretty sure that it has the track spaced farther
apart rather than using only the first 40 tracks.
More information about the Coco
mailing list