[Coco] CC vers Make

[John Donaldson]

Gene,
   Yes, thank you very much. It works great. Just have to remember to 
add the option
for 2 pass instead of single pass.

John Donaldson


Gene Heskett wrote:

>On Sunday 15 January 2006 10:50, John Donaldson wrote:
>  
>
>> I was wondering what was more common among those of us that program
>>in C. Do you use a interface like CC or CC2 to compile all your
>>programs or do you use MAKE.
>>When I had my MM/1 and had converted RIBBS to KRIBBS, I used MAKE all
>>the time since I was dealing with muti-modules per program and CC or
>>CC2 if I am only
>>dealing with a single program.
>> I put echo statements in my MAKE so I could tell what it was doing.
>>I notice that CC
>>does this automaticly but CC2 doesn't.
>>
>>John Donaldson
>>    
>>
>
>I think this is a matter of personal taste John, and I've used both.  
>Our coco Make is a bit long in the tooth nowadays but it does have some 
>interesting tools that cc etc don't have.
>
>OTOH, cc isn't limited to one file at a time by any means, you could 'cc 
>foo.c -ofoo' and do a perfectly legal compile if foo.c was nothing more 
>than a list of includes:
>
>#include foo.h
>#include bar.c
>#include baz.c
>etc
>
>I actually prefer this latter style because its simpler to keep track of 
>than a Makefile thats semi-intelligent.  But, if a piece of code comes 
>along with a Makefile, I won't throw it away either.
>
>Did you get that .dsk I sent, with c.prep and cc311.lzh in it?
>
>  
>