[coco] Caller ID
Gene Heskett
gene.heskett at verizon.net
Sun Feb 12 12:35:25 EST 2006
On Sunday 12 February 2006 07:42, George's Coco Address wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Aaron Banerjee" Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 6:42 AM
>
><snip>
>
>> Coco-related:
>> Many years ago, there was an article in "Electronics Now" that
>> showed the format for (telephone) caller ID. It was a series of
>> signals sent between rings that happened to use 1 cycle at 2400hz to
>> be "1" and one cycle 1200hz to be "0". The format only accomodated
>> for a number. Does anyone happen to know the current format for
>> caller ID? I had thought at one time to use the coco cassette to
>> build a soft caller-id box (you could have fun with that one -- IF
>> NUMBER="telemarketer" then HANGUP). I was thinking of using the
>> ring signal (of course adequately protecting the coco against it) as
>> some sort of trigger.
>> I was hoping someone on the list had a more modern knowledge of
>> this type of thing than me. Any insight would be appreciated.
>> Thanks. - Aaron
>
> I too, had thought of doing something like this.
>
> When I read this, a bell rang and I decided to do a search for info
> on the caller ID (CID) thng.
> This link does not reveal the baud rate. It does show the format.
>
>http://picbasic.com/resources/callerid.htm
>
Its whatever the interface is set for. NOT the telco line speed, but
the speed the serial port is currently using. On some modern modems,
that could well be 115kbaud.
>George
--
Cheers, Gene
People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should add the word
'online' between the 'verizon', and the dot which bypasses vz's
stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-)
Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
message by Gene Heskett are:
Copyright 2006 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
More information about the Coco
mailing list