[coco] application for exhibit + playing with the telephone...
Aaron Banerjee
spam_proof at worldnet.att.net
Sun Feb 12 07:42:25 EST 2006
It's good to see that the Marx Brothers are alive and well. The 4
computers on my network are "Groucho", "Harpo", "Chico", and "Zeppo".
A surprising number of my friends at work simply don't get it (e.g. never
heard of 'em).
Coco-related:
Many years ago, there was an article in "Electronics Now" that showed
the format for (telephone) caller ID. It was a series of signals sent
between rings that happened to use 1 cycle at 2400hz to be "1" and one
cycle 1200hz to be "0". The format only accomodated for a number. Does
anyone happen to know the current format for caller ID? I had thought at
one time to use the coco cassette to build a soft caller-id box (you could
have fun with that one -- IF NUMBER="telemarketer" then HANGUP). I was
thinking of using the ring signal (of course adequately protecting the
coco against it) as some sort of trigger.
I was hoping someone on the list had a more modern knowledge of this
type of thing than me. Any insight would be appreciated. Thanks.
- Aaron
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 RJRTTY at aol.com wrote:
> People,
> So I am filling in my exhibit application for the
> fest and I get to the "sanity clause" legal
> condition at the bottom of the form which
> states:
> "In the event that the party of the first part or the
> party of the second part should be declared to be
> insane, this agreement will be deemed to be null
> and void."
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list