[Coco] I said *word* *processors*!!!
Leon Howell
puritan_2076 at yahoo.com
Tue Feb 14 16:14:31 EST 2006
I don't get it. The CoCo 3 is better than Atari or Commodore. OS-9 Level II
is better than CP/M, Geos, or SPDX. So why do they all have such great word
processors, and all we get are lousy text editors???
Maybe I misunderstand just what T/S-Word or Dynastar can do. The ads for FHL
in Rainbow 1988 said Dynastar had centering, align left/right, page numbering,
auto page breaks, auto indent, word wrap, etc., all with the Wordstar commands
I'm already familliar with. But did it really? Or was all that done by a
seperate program called DynaForm? And would it be shown on screen, or would I
have to wait and print it to see what I get?
What about T/S-Word? I understand it acts as a graphical main menu for the
editor, T/S-Spell, and formatting. At least that brings everything into one
environment, even if it's all done at seperate times. But do I get to see it
all on screen, or do I have to print it to see anything?
I once heard that Color Scripsit II was pretty much T/S-Word on a cartridge.
Is T/S-Word really *that* bad?
What does the T/S mean?
More information about the Coco
mailing list