[Coco] [Rainbow on Disc] scanned vs. camera
Steve Ostrom
smostrom at mn.rr.com
Fri Apr 28 22:12:37 EDT 2006
#2, please
-- Steve Ostrom --
Michael Wayne Harwood wrote:
>Anyone who is planning on getting a copy of the "Rainbow on Disc" please
>tell me the following:
>
>1. The "camera" version is just fine - do that so that I can get it ASAP
>2. The "scanned" version is my preference, and I will wait to get that.
>3. I want both - give me the "camera" version ASAP and I will pay the
>license fees a second time to get the "scanned" version when available.
>
>Regards,
>Michael Harwood
>
>
>
>>Can we revisit this one more time? I have posted 2 .djvu files for a true
>>apples to apples comparison - both files are 1.6mb is size and of the
>>exact same 10 pages of the August 1989 issue. These files have not been
>>OCR'd.
>>
>>The purpose of this comparison is to look at two files that use different
>>sources for image capture of the Rainbow magazine pages and determine
>>whether the images gathered via the camera are "good enough" or whether
>>the wait for the rest of the images to be scanned is worth the effort.
>>Please focus your attention on image quality.
>>
>>The .djvu files are as follows:
>>
>>http://www.musicheadproductions.org/downloads/camera.djvu
>>http://www.musicheadproductions.org/downloads/scanned.djvu
>>
>>Regards,
>>Michael Harwood
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>Coco mailing list
>>Coco at maltedmedia.com
>>http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/coco
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>"The best place to be is here,
> the best time to be is now."
> -- Bill and Ted
>
>
>
>
More information about the Coco
mailing list