[Coco] A return to bit.listserv.coco?

[billg]

Thank you, sir, I just wanted to make sure everyone knew that I was not
QUITE	so dizzy as to contradict myself from one post to another.

IMHO, I agree with whomever it was that said that as soon as traffic
increases on bit.listserv.coco, so would the spam, the filth, and the
harassment.

I, personally, would rather have a topic of interest come to me in my
mailbox, instead of having to search for it on the vast internet or the much
abused newsgroups. (Remember, that's just the opinion of a fat, lazy,
crippled guy).

I have sufficient "rules" engaged on my mail reader (Outlook), that what
little spam I get is pretty well kicked aside and dumped LONG before I see
it.

So, to sum it up, I like it here.  I like the job that the moderator or
owner or both are doing, and would hate to have to go somewhere else.

Again, that's my opinion.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com 
>[mailto:coco-bounces at maltedmedia.com] On Behalf Of Boisy G.Pitre
>Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 3:56 PM
>To: CoCoList for Color Computer Enthusiasts
>Subject: Re: [Coco] A return to bit.listserv.coco?
>
>On Mar 21, 2005, at 2:52 PM, billg wrote:
>
>>  As you see I have marked the end of my post.  Whoever is 
>saying that 
>> 'my other post' says so-and-so is IN ERROR.  My next post said "Why 
>> not try going back to the bit.listserv.coco and see"
>
>Calm down there billg. I was replying to Robert Sherwood.