[Coco] Sigmon

[Arthur Flexser]

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004, Robert Gault wrote:

> Arthur Flexser wrote:
> > 
> > I used it mainly as a debugger and disassembler, and it was far better
> > than Edtasm for that.  Since I wasn't assembling programs, the lack of
> > disk I/O was irrelevant to me, and I never even bothered to use the disk
> > version.  I now recollect some of the most important commands:
> > 
> > DIS 2000 start disassembling at $2000
> > STEP 2000 single step at $2000, one step per press of the space bar
> > BRK 2000 set breakpoint at $2000
> > GO 2000 like "exec $2000"
> > PRT (or maybe PRT ON) send output to printer
> > ASM assemble
> > QUIT
> > 
> > 
> > Art
> > 
> > 
> 
> Why did you consider this program better than ZBUG in EDTASM+ for 
> disassembly?
> 

I don't really recollect very well.  I liked the ease of single stepping
and using breakpoints--I'm not sure how well ZBUG supported those
functions.  I think the program was also smaller and loaded faster than
Edtasm.

Art