[Coco] 8-Bit Microcomputers
Theodore Evans (Alex)
alxevans at concentric.net
Mon Jan 26 00:04:03 EST 2004
On Jan 25, 2004, at 6:14 PM, David Hazelton wrote:
> KnudsenMJ at aol.com wrote:
>
>> industry-standard floppy interface was a real gift, and we didn't
>> waste it!
>> Also, despite the jokes about Tandy's serial printers and modems,
>> that interface was standard RS-232, once you got past the 4-pin DIN
>> connector (which hung from the walls in Rad Shack store). And the
>> manual documented the pinouts.
>
> Actually, it wasn't standard RS-232, Since if I remember right it was
> +3/-3v instead of +5/-5v. This actually helped me at a job I once
> had. I worked at Cabletron and I had a sales person call me to ask
> why Cabletron's Terminal Server (Xylogic's Annex3 in a Cabletron hub)
> couldn't see a RS-232 device. A Unix machine was polling the ports to
> read power gauges. While Cabletron's Terminal Server sat there
> blankly along with 2 other companies Terminal Servers, Cisco's
> Terminal Server was reading the gauges happily. It made Cabletron
> look bad. Well, Cabletron at the time resold Cisco routers redesigned
> for thier hub, so I called up a Cisco engineer to ask him, he didn't
> know off the top of his head, but when I mentioned that it acted like
> the guage voltage wasn't high enough and that I had seen a system that
> RS-232 was based as +3/-3v, he looked at the schematics. True enough
> that was the problem, testing the gauges voltage, it never went above
> 3.5 volts. Cabletron lost the contract and Cisco won.
In either case it wouldn't be standard RS-232. Early RS-232 was
+12/-12. Later the standard was expanded to take -12-0/+5-+12 for
signaling (about the same time that RS-422 came out). Long before the
expanded signaling became standard nearly all equipment would accept
the expanded signaling levels.
More information about the Coco
mailing list