[Coco] Thanks for the Princeton Bit.Listserv.CoCo Mail List. DRAFT

[Roger Taylor]

At 12:36 PM 2/2/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>At 12:42 PM 2/1/2004 -0800, someone here wrote:
>>Why are you so eager to kill the Princeton list?
>
>but the answer was in the quoted message:
>
>
>>>The listserver at Princeton is collecting, archiving and sending out a
>>>steady stream of SPAM with no CoCo messages.
>
>:)


Well, I read the thread some more and I agree with both people in the 
argument about Princeton.  I don't think we should do anything at all about 
the list over there... just let it be.  Those wanting a spam-free 
environment and the right to read porn-free messages will hang around here, 
while others may remain on the Princeton server because they have the best 
filtering system in the world and don't mind deleting the occasional spam 
that gets through.  I really think that someone from the list actually did 
attack the list, probably more than one person, after some real heated 
battles were going on.  There were a lot of porn messages that started 
coming in that said the Princeton list was subscribed.  I clearly remember 
suddenly seeing those types of messages blast in and immediately bringing 
the subject up in the room that I suspected someone was attacking the list.



----------
Roger Taylor