[Coco] gcc-coco revisited
David
dbree at duo-county.com
Fri Oct 31 12:24:01 EST 2003
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 11:00:58AM -0500, KnudsenMJ at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 10/31/03 8:14:10 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> dbree at duo-county.com writes:
>
> > The biggest problem right now is the addition of the "direct" directive
> > to gcc. I'm sure it can be done, but it's going to take some studying
> > (for me, if I do it) to learn how to add a directive to gcc.
>
> And how to make it affect the output code.
> At least Microware C did a great job on "direct."
I think I know the answer to this. Once we get "direct" inserted - it
would set a flag, then, when it comes time to write the line(s) into the
source file, you use DP code, rather than extended.
> You can't write really efficient 6809 code without it! Global variables rule!
Exactly! "Direct" is a must. Actually, we would need this in the RSDOS
version, too.
More information about the Coco
mailing list